3.18

Young Ladies’ Department of the Ladies’ Cooperative Retrenchment Association, Resolutions, May 27, 1870

Young Ladies’ Department of the Ladies’ Cooperative Retrenchment Association, Resolutions, May 27, 1870, in “Resolutions Adopted by the First Young Ladies’ Department of the Ladies’ Co-operative Retrenchment Association, S.L. City, Organized May 27, 1870,” Deseret Evening News (Salt Lake City, UT), June 20, 1870, vol. 3, no. 178, p. [2].

See image of the original document at udn.lib.utah.edu, courtesy of J. Willard Marriott Library, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.

During 1869 and 1870, Latter-day Saint women developed a distinct organization for young women, the first such organization in the church’s history.1 This organization, the Young Ladies’ Department of the Ladies’ Cooperative Retrenchment Association, was initiated in response to Brigham Young’s call for simplification in meal preparation, housekeeping, and clothing.2 The Young Ladies’ Department operated both in connection with and separately from the Relief Society.

The first young ladies’ organization consisted of Brigham Young’s adolescent and young adult daughters (ranging in age from fourteen to twenty-two), both married and unmarried. According to Maria Young Dougall and her sister Susa Young Gates, their father frequently spoke of the importance of organizing his daughters so that his family might “set an example to the daughters of Zion that would be worthy of imitation.” Indeed, for several months before the organization, Brigham Young had articulated the concern for reform to members of his large family, particularly to those who gathered for evening prayers at their Salt Lake City residence, the Lion House. Both Dougall and Gates recalled that the initial organization meeting for the Young daughters occurred on Sunday evening, November 28, 1869, two weeks after Young publicly called for reform in the Salt Lake tabernacle.3 This is traditionally considered the founding date, though the exact events of that evening are unclear; the daughters’ memories of the November 28 gathering seem to have been conflated with a similar Lion House gathering six months later. Notes in the Historian’s Office Journal for May 25, 1870, recorded that “at prayer time” Young assembled “quite a large number of his family together” along with church historian George A. Smith and his wife, Bathsheba W. Smith. Following prayer, Young told his family that “the eyes of the world were upon them also the eyes of the Saints. … He wished his wives and daughters always to adopt their own fashions and to set an example and as far as possible to manufacture what they wore.”4

On May 27, 1870, which should be considered the formal founding date of the young ladies’ organization, Young’s daughters organized themselves as the First Young Ladies’ Department of the Ladies’ Cooperative Retrenchment Association and adopted resolutions composed by Eliza R. Snow,5 one of Young’s plural wives and an avid proponent of reform.6 The resolutions, as published in the Deseret Evening News the following month, are reproduced below.7 Dougall recalled subsequent meetings where the Young daughters received instructions from older women, including Snow, then assisting with the organization of ward Relief Societies, and Mary Isabella Horne, newly elected president of the Ladies’ Cooperative Retrenchment Association.8 “We were to have resolutions and by-laws,” Dougall remembered, “and we were to retrench in our clothing.”9 Four days later, on May 31, the Second Young Ladies’ Department of the Ladies’ Cooperative Retrenchment Association was organized by another group of young women.10 Thereafter Retrenchment Associations were organized in various Salt Lake City wards and other settlements, following the pattern set here whereby older women encouraged and directed younger women. In Salt Lake City, the first “young ladies’ departments” both met on their own and joined with older women twice monthly in the Senior and Junior Ladies’ Cooperative Retrenchment Association. The young ladies’ departments soon became known as the Young Ladies’ Retrenchment Association; in 1877 the organization was officially renamed the Young Ladies’ Mutual Improvement Association, often abbreviated Y.L.M.I.A.11

RESOLUTIONS

Adopted by the First Young Ladies’ Department of the Ladies’ Co-operative Retrenchment Association, S.L. City, organized May 27, 1870.

Resolved.—That, realizing ourselves to be wives and daughters of Apostles, Prophets and Elders of Israel, and, as such, that high responsibilities rest upon us, and that we shall be held accountable to God, not only for the privileges we inherit from our fathers, but also for the blessings we enjoy as Latter-day Saints, we feel to unite and co-operate with, and do mutually pledge ourselves that we will uphold and sustain each other in doing good.

Resolved.—That, inasmuch as the Saints have been commanded to gather out from Babylon and “n[o]t12 partake of her sins, that they receive not of her plagues,”13 we feel that we should not condescend to imitate the pride, folly and fashions of the world; and inasmuch as the church of Jesus Christ is likened unto a city set on a hill to be a beacon of light to all nations, it is our duty to set examples for others, instead of seeking to pattern after them.

Resolved.—That we will respect ancient and modern apostolic instructions. St. Paul exhorted Timothy to teach “the women to adorn themselves in modest apparel—not with braided hair, or gold or pearls, or costly array; but which becometh women pro[f]essing godliness, with good works.”14 Peter, also, in his first epi[s]tle,15 in speaking of women, says, “Whose adorning, let it not be that outward adorning of plaiting the hair, and wearing of gold, or of putting on apprrel; but let it be the hidden man of the heart, in that which is not corruptible, even the ornament of a meek and quiet spirit, which is in the sight of God, of great price: for after this manner in old time, the holy women also, who trusted in God, adorned themselves.”16 In a revelation given to the Latter-day Saints in 1831, the Lord said, “Thou shalt not be proud in thy heart; let all thy garments be plain, and their beauty, the beauty of the work of thine own hands.”17 All of which, we accept as true principle, and such as should be fully illustrated in our practice.

Resolved.—That, with a firm and settled determination to honor the foregoing requirements, and being deeply sensible of the sinful ambition and vanity in dress among the daughters of Zion, which are calculated to foster the pride of the world, and shut out the spirit of God from the heart, we mutually agree to exert our influence, both by precept and by example, to suppress, and to eventually eradicate these evils.

Resolved.—That, admitting variety has its charms, we know that real beauty appears to greater advantage in a plain dress than when bedizened with finery, and while we disapprobate extravagance and waste, we would not, like the Quakers, recommend a uniform, but would have each one to choose the style best adapted to her own taste and person:18 at the same time we shall avoid, and ignore as obsolete with us, all extremes which are opposed to good sense, or repulsive to modesty.

Resolved.—That, inasmuch as cleanliness is a characteristic of a Saint, and an imperative duty, we shall discard the dragging skirts, and, for decency’s sake, those disgustingly short ones, extending no lower than the boot tops. We also regard “paniers,” and whatever approximates in appearance toward the “Grecian Bend,” a burlesque on the natural beauty and dignity of the human female form, and will not disgrace our persons by wearing them.19 And, also, as fast as it shall be expedient, we shall adopt the wearing of home-made articles, and exercise our united influence in rendering them fashionable.

Mrs. Ella Y. Emp[e]y, Pres.20

Mrs. Emily Y. Clawson,

Mrs. Zina Y. Williams,

Mrs. Maria Y. McDougal [Dougall],

Mrs. Caroline Y. Croxall,

Miss Dora [Eudora] Young,

Miss Phebe Young,

Counselors.

Cite This Page

Cite This Page

Young Ladies’ Department of the Ladies’ Cooperative Retrenchment Association, Resolutions, May 27, 1870, The First Fifty Years of Relief Society, accessed December 18, 2024 https://chpress-web.churchhistorianspress.org/the-first-fifty-years-of-relief-society/part-3/3-18

Footnotes

  1. [1]An earlier organization that included both single men and women under the age of thirty—a “Young Gentlemen and Ladies Relief Society of Nauvoo”—had been established in 1843 to organize charitable activities. (Glen M. Leonard, Nauvoo: A Place of Peace, a People of Promise [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book; Provo, UT: Brigham Young University Press, 2002], 226–227; “A Short Sketch of the Rise of the Young Gentlemen and Ladies Relief Society of Nauvoo,” Times and Seasons, Apr. 1, 1843, 4:154–157.)

  2. [2]See Documents 3.15 and 3.16.

  3. [3]Maria Young Dougall, “Reminiscences,” Young Woman’s Journal 30, no. 11 (Nov. 1919): 594; Susa Young Gates, History of the Young Ladies’ Mutual Improvement Association of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, from November 1869 to June 1910 (Salt Lake City: Deseret News, 1911), 5–12; “Remarks,” Deseret News [weekly], Nov. 24, 1869, 495–496.

  4. [4]Church History Department, Historical Department Office Journal, 1844–2012, 102 vols., CHL, 31:71. According to an account written by Susa Young Gates several decades later, the November 28, 1869, meeting included George A. and Bathsheba Smith and resulted in the resolutions featured in this document. However, the Church Historian’s Office journal indicates that George A. Smith was away from Salt Lake City from November 26 to 30, 1869, and the journal’s November 28 entry notes no Lion House meeting. Gates’s account, apparently drawn from her own memory and from recollections Bathsheba Smith shared privately with Gates, evidently conflates the initial November 28, 1869, meeting with the May 25, 1870, gathering in the Lion House. (See Gates, History of the Young Ladies’ Mutual Improvement Association, 5–12; Church History Department, Office Journal, 30:363–365; and Maria Young Dougall, “Reminiscences,” Young Woman’s Journal 30, no. 11 [Nov. 1919]: 594–595.)

  5. [5]A manuscript copy of the resolutions made about nine years later includes this note: “We record as belonging to the history of the Y.L.M.I. Association, the following copy of the original ‘Resolutions,’ as written by the hand of its author, Miss E. R. Snow.” (Salt Lake Stake, Young Women’s Mutual Improvement Association Minutes and Records, 1871–1973, 5 vols., CHL, vol. 1, 5–7.)

  6. [6]For more on Snow’s influence in the early young women’s organization, see Thirteenth Ward, Ensign Stake, Relief Society Minutes and Records, 1868–1906, CHL, vol. 1, June 2, 1870; Maria Young Dougall, “Reminiscences,” Young Woman’s Journal 30, no. 11 (Nov. 1919): 595; and Clarissa Young Spencer and Mabel Harmer, Brigham Young at Home (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book, 1940), 82–86.

  7. [7]A handwritten version of these resolutions produced around this same time is extant in the Zina D. Young Papers. As compared to the Deseret Evening News version reproduced below, the copy included in Young’s papers displays multiple textual variants. The relationship between the Deseret Evening News and handwritten versions is unclear. (See “Articles Subscribed to and Adopted by the Young Ladies Department of the Ladies Co-operative Retrenchment Association,” n.d., Zina D. Young Papers, Zina Card Brown Family Collection, 1806–1972, CHL.)

  8. [8]See Document 3.16.

  9. [9]Maria Young Dougall, “Reminiscences,” Young Woman’s Journal 30, no. 11 (Nov. 1919): 594–595.

  10. [10]“Resolutions,” Deseret News [weekly], June 29, 1870, 249.

  11. [11]On the name change, see Brigham Young to Don Carlos and Feramorz Little Young, Aug. 6, 1877, in Brigham Young Office Files, 1832–1878, CHL; and “Home Affairs,” Woman’s Exponent, Oct. 1, 1877, 6:68.

  12. [12]text: In the copy used for transcription, there is a blank space between the n and the t.

  13. [13]Revelation 18:4.

  14. [14]1 Timothy 2:9–10.

  15. [15]text: In the copy used for transcription, there is a blank space between the i and the t.

  16. [16]1 Peter 3:3–5.

  17. [17]Doctrine and Covenants 42:40.

  18. [18]George Fox, founder of the Religious Society of Friends (or Quakers), recommended simplicity and plainness in dressing as a precaution against vanity and pride, but clothing was not confined to uniform colors or designs. (See Thomas Clarkson, A Portraiture of Quakerism. Taken from a View of the Education and Discipline, Social Manners, Civil and Political Economy, Religious Principles and Character, of the Society of Friends, 3 vols. [New York: Samuel Stansbury, 1806], 1:241–267; Mary Anne Caton, “The Aesthetics of Absence: Quaker Women’s Plain Dress in the Delaware Valley, 1790–1900,” in Quaker Aesthetics: Reflections on a Quaker Ethic in American Design and Consumption, ed. Emma Jones Lapsansky and Anne A. Verplanck [Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2003], 246–271.)

  19. [19]A “panier” was a “frame of whalebone, wire or other material, used to distend the skirt of a woman’s dress at the hips,” or “a bunched up part of a skirt forming a protuberance behind.” The “Grecian bend” was originally a term applied to a bent posture: “An affected carriage of the body, in which it is bent forward from the hips.” At this time, the “Grecian bend” referred to the silhouette achieved when a dress skirt was straight at the front and sides with extreme fullness at the back. A Deseret News editorial commented that “fashions have passed from enormous crinolines, which made their wearers look like huge bells, to the long trains which spread out like a peacock’s tail, to the present fashion of lank skirts, the short walking costume, the Grecian bend, and the panier.” Brigham Young asked Relief Society members to avoid the “Grecian bend,” adding that “so far as my taste is concerned I would much rather see a ‘Mormon bend’ than a ‘Grecian bend.’” (“Grecian,” and “Pannier,” in The Oxford English Dictionary, ed. James A. H. Murray et al., 12 vols., 1933, reprint [Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1970], 4:392, 7:425; “Fashions—A Much Needed Reform,” Deseret News [weekly], June 29, 1870, 246; “Discourse,” Deseret News [weekly], Aug. 18, 1869, 331–332; see also Carma de Jong Anderson, “Mormon Clothing in Utah, 1847–1900,” in Nearly Everything Imaginable: The Everyday Life of Utah’s Mormon Pioneers, ed. Ronald W. Walker and Doris R. Dant, Studies in Latter-day Saint History [Provo, UT: Brigham Young University Press, 1999], 175–194; and Ruth Vickers Clayton, “Clothing and the Temporal Kingdom: Mormon Clothing Practices, 1847 to 1887” [PhD diss., Purdue University, 1987], 191.)

  20. [20]The version of this document in the Zina Young Papers adds to this list of officers the name of Henrietta L. Southworth—presumably as secretary, although not identified as such. (“Articles Subscribed to and Adopted by the Young Ladies Department of the Ladies Co-operative Retrenchment Association.”)